Linen stores for best sheets and bedding ideas

Question by Vincent A: Are Harvard and Yale still “hot-beds” of PC an “liberalism”?
Or are they all “keeping their heads down” while Hillary is running in the Election?
Y’ know “Don’t frighten the peasants with too many lunatic ideas.”
Sorry for delay,have been examining cosmic implications of:”Does my Bum look big in this?”
What I mean about PC is that they give the impression of finding the answer yourself.
But you’d better be damn sure that it’s the “approved right answer”
NOW, firstly,I am English (in the UK)
and I am not trying to interfere with any of your systems!
But PC was begun by European “intellectuals” and Harvard and Yale took it up.Then rejected it.Then took it up again when Communism collapsed.
European and British Communists(including Blair) went into the closet and came out as PC and “liberal”(same in USA)
They used old Commie arguments. But had one advantage.
PC (by definition ,was correct)
Thus any semi-literate half-wit could say anything, and ,if he had any positioon in the PC hierarchy, it would be correct
So: the High Priestess of PC an feminism states that :
E=mc^2 is a “sexed equation”
And no physicist dare argue,unless he wants his name on “The List”
Later on I’ll get down to the “Nitty-Gritty

By the way, any contemptuous silence will be treated as agreement.
I must say that I do see your point.
And also feel your pain.
This is why you will have to ensure that only the “liberal elite” and their duly appointed “Commissars” will have any privacy on the ‘Net.
Their are so many little traps that you can walk into.
So many errors of judgment to make.
So many wrong assumptions that can leave you “red-faced”.
When you don’t know who is on the other end of the line.
Your best bet would be to find an old Commie who could tip you off to possible replies.
BUT unfortunately he will be forced to the same cnclusion:
We dare say NOTHING until we have total control of all methods of COMMUNICATION!
Must be very frustrating for you:
You can’t assume my Race.
You can’t assume my Sex.
You can’t assume that I’m a poofter
And, worst of all, you are hoist by your own petard: you can’t make a generalisation.That of course would trap you in the deadly swamp of stereotyping
Just have to work harder on destroying:
All secrecy.
All privacy.
Hi Rowan,
The whole point is to give the illusion of examining an argument from all sides.
But you’d better reach the “right”
answer if you want “approval” from your examiners who are themselves shackled by the strictures of PC and “liberalism”
Hi James,how are you?
You seem to know what’s going on.
It’s far advanced in the UK
Don’t anyone get me wrong,please.
I am not sticking my nose in US affairs.
Nor am I moaning about what’s happening in the UK.
I am appalled at the way that PC means:
That Executive power over-rules Legislative power.
That the WHIM of some semi-literate can over-rule a Mathematician.
A bureaucracy of semi-literates is being given the authority to RULE for the simple reason that their great-great-grandaddy once picked cotton,or speared seals.
Little bit of fact from UK:
You can be fired for being “too White or too British”
If you kill a poofter you will get twice as long in jail than if you kill a straight.
If two buddies share an apartment they will get tax benefits and allowances and so on.
If they start f**k**g each other the Government will immediately give them more money.
I see that violations are flying around:
I don’t suppose that you can fit much intelligence or intellect into a closed,small, or petty mind.

Best answer:

Answer by Fish
DUH!!!

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

{ 0 comments }